Last edited by Mazubei
Sunday, July 26, 2020 | History

2 edition of Application for review of judgement no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal = found in the catalog.

Application for review of judgement no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal =

International Court of Justice.

Application for review of judgement no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal =

Demande de réformation du jugement no. 273 du Tribunal administratif des Nations unies.

by International Court of Justice.

  • 113 Want to read
  • 29 Currently reading

Published by International Court of Justice, sold by United Nations, Sales Section in [Hague], [New York .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • United Nations -- Officials and employees

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesDemande de réformation du jugement no. 273 du Tribunal administratif des Nations unies.
    SeriesPleadings, oral arguments, documents, Pleadings, oral arguments, documents
    ContributionsUnited Nations. Administrative Tribunal.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsJX1977.8.O35 F374 1982
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxiv, 239 p. ;
    Number of Pages239
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL15144783M

    International Court of Justice. Counsel and Advocate for Bosnia and Herzegovina in the case concerning the Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July in the Case concerning Counsel and Advocate for France in the case concerning Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. In the case of a request for an advisory opinion by the UNGA, the question should be one arising within its scope of activities (Application for Review of Judgement No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal). Article 10 of the UN Charter confers upon the UNGA competence relating to “any questions or any matters” within the scope.

    United Nations Administrative Tribunal Judgements (in english): No. to No. (Add.) Judgment No. UNAT 2 of 10 JUDGE ROSALYN CHAPMAN, PRESIDING. 1. On 19 February , the Dispute Tribunal of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA DT or UNRWA Dispute Tribunal and UNRWA or Agency, respectively) issued Judgment No. UNRWA/DT//, in the case of Chahrour v.

    United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT or Dispute Tribunal) non-receivable. The delay in filing administrative review (or management ev aluation) cannot be waived under Article 8(3). THE UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL Judgment No. UNAT 3 of 11 In response to Mr. Mbok’s queries about UNDP’s 30 September memorandum, UNDP confirmed by e-mails dated 2 and


Share this book
You might also like
Desktop publishing on LAN with Ventura Publisher 3.0

Desktop publishing on LAN with Ventura Publisher 3.0

Rayleigh and Raman scattering.

Rayleigh and Raman scattering.

Green again.

Green again.

Constantia in fide

Constantia in fide

Around theatres.

Around theatres.

Court-hand restored, or, the students assistant in reading old deeds, charters, records etc.....

Court-hand restored, or, the students assistant in reading old deeds, charters, records etc.....

I like the world.

I like the world.

Fabian journal

Fabian journal

Structure of studies and place of research in mass higher education

Structure of studies and place of research in mass higher education

Londonderry and the London companies 1609-1629

Londonderry and the London companies 1609-1629

Emet ve-emunah

Emet ve-emunah

Womens movement in Japan

Womens movement in Japan

Studies in accounting

Studies in accounting

Application for review of judgement no. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal = by International Court of Justice. Download PDF EPUB FB2

The Judgement of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Judgement No. ) which was the subject of the application to the Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements resulting in the present request for advisory opinion was given on 15 May in case No.

Mortished v. the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The Judgement of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Judgement No.

) which was the subject of the application to the Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements resulting in the present request for advisory opinion was given on 15 May in case No.Mortished v.

Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal - Request for advisory opinion by the Committee on Application for. "The Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements has decided that there is a substantial basis within the meaning of Article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal for the application presented by the United States of America for review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement No.

delivered at Geneva on 15 May Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal / International Court of Justice = Demande de reformation du jugement no.

du Tribunal administratif des Nations Unies / Cour internationale de justice I.C.J. ; Sales Section, United Nations [distributor [Hague, Netherlands]: New York, NY, USA requested in July on an Application for Review of Judgement No.

of the United Nations Admin-istrative Tribunal, concerning the payment of a repatriation grant to a United Nations staff member on separation from service (p. Two Judges were re-elected and three new ones elected to the Court for terms beginning in February (p.

application for review of judgement no. of the united nations administrative tribunal advisory opinion of 20 july case concerning the continental shelf (libyan arab jamahiriya/malta) (application for permission to intervene) judgment of 21 march case concerning military and paramilitary activities in.

United Nations Administrative Tribunal. As a result of the decision of the General Assembly to establish a new system of administration of justice, including a two-tier formal system comprising a first instance, the UN Dispute Tribunal, and an appellate instance, the UN Appeals Tribunal, the UN Administrative Tribunal was abolished as of 31 December (See resolutions 61/ of 4 April.

Tribunal, decided on 13 July that there was a substantial basis for an application for review of judgement No. ; Whereas the Committee had requested an advisory opinion of the Intemational Court of Justice on the following question: “1s the judgement of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in Judgement No.

Mortished v. the. States entitled to appear before the Court. States not members of the United Nations parties to the Statute. States not parties to the Statute to which the Court may be open.

Basis of the Court’s jurisdiction. Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory. Treaties. Advisory Jurisdiction. Get this from a library. Application for review of judgement no. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal. [Ivor Peter Mortished; United Nations.

Administrative Tribunal.; International Court of Justice.; United Nations. Secretary-General.;]. United Nations Administrative Tribunal.

Frequently Asked Questions. Can I bring a case for execution of judgement directly to the Tribunal. In accordance with current jurisprudence, the Tribunal is of the view that the Respondent’s failure to implement an order is a new administrative decision which must be the subject matter of a.

Administrative Tribunal of the United Nations Judgement No. (Original: French) Case No. Mortished Against: The Secretary-General of the United Nations Request of a former staff member for recognition of his entitlement to a repatriation grant.

By that letter the Secretary-General informed the Court that the Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements, set up by General Assembly resolution (X), had, pursuant to Article 11 of the Statute of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, decided on 20 June that there was a substantial basis for the.

2 Administrative Tribunal of the United Nations Whereas, at the Applicant’s request and with the Respondent’s agreement, the President extended to 22 September the time-limit for the filing of the application; Whereas, on 22 Septemberthe Applicant filed an application.

the United Nations and the specialized agencies that have accepted the statute of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (UNAT).4 This article will start by providing an overview of the deficiencies of the current internal justice system of the United Nations and will then analyze the recommendations for reform and their chances for success.

Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reportsp. Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamarhiriya/Malta), Application by Italy for Permission to Intervene, Judgment, I.C.J. Reportsp. "The Committee on Applications for Review of Administrative Tribunal Judgements has decided that there is a substantial basis within the meaning of Article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal for the application for the review of Administrative Tribunal Judgement No.

delivered at Geneva on 28 April of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, I.C.J. (July 20); Application for Review of Judgement No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, I.C.J. 18 (May 27).Author: Joanna Gomula. The United Nations Appeals Tribunal (Appeals Tribunal) has before it an appeal filed by Ms. Rawan Ezzeddin Badawi (Appellant) against Judgment No. UNRWA/DT// rendered by the Dispute Tribunal (DT) of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA or Agency) on 13 October in Amman, Jordan.The judgments and orders of the UN Appeals Tribunal (UNAT) are public and available on this website.

They are available both in list form, and through Unite search, which gives you further search.Application for Review of Judgment No.

of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Order (Time-Limits), I.C.J. 52 (ICJ, Oct. 08, ) Application for Review of Judgment No. of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Order (Time-Limits), I.C.J. 49 (ICJ, Aug. 06, ) United .